Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 


On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:



On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote:


Op 6-6-2011 11:37, toki schreef:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/06/2011 15:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:


A formal, legal foundation. The ASF is a recognized 501(c)3, non-

TDF might not have 501(c)(3) status, but then consider that it is
incorporated in Germany, not the United States.

That 501(c)(3) status aside, is TDF actually a legally established foundation (yet)?


I also think that 'independent' is also an adjective that belongs
there... being independent is quite important to a number
of FOSS ecosystem people...


While that is clearly a true statement, you seem to be implying that you don't think TDF is 
"independent".  Please can you explain what you mean?

Thanks.

S.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.