Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:17, Florian Effenberger
<floeff@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi Jim,

Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 18.06:

The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it
 crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force
 The Apache Foundation to take the project.


How?

I am *not* saying you would be influenced or forced - I'd never doubt that
you are deciding independent. However, what people may give the feeling that
something's wrong are statements like these:

http://www.sutor.com/c/2011/06/some-remarks-on-openoffice-going-to-apache/comment-page-1/#comment-5309

"it is a done deal"

That might create wrong impressions...

I'll repeat what Jim said: how do you think IBM can force us to take
the project? Bob can say whatever he'd like on his blog.

The software grant is a "done deal". I happen to believe the proposal
will be accepted, but it is not a "done deal".

In any case... stop assuming that what *one* person says is
representative of the entire (ASF) community. That simply isn't true.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.