On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 00:02 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
Hi Drew, :-)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 22:11, drew <drew@baseanswers.com> wrote:
It doesn't sound good to me.
So can you clarify what your position is with regard to Nabble?
Hi David,
Sure - I would use nabble the way it is currently configured..but then I
may be bias on that.
There are already a number of people signing up there and beginning to
use it to post to the mailing lists, more then I expected actually.
To make nabble read only would be to circumvent the real advantage of
making if available, the ability to post to a LibreOffice/TDF mailing
without being moderated, in other words subscribed, but without having
to deal with every response going to your mail box.
Sure same deal with a few other options, but that is then thing about
choice, different solutions appeal to different people.
Thanks
Drew
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] [Forum]How will the forum be organized? (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Forum]How will the forum be organized? · drew
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.