On 02/01/2011 19:09, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011/01/02 12:47 PM Italo Vignoli wrote:
If you want to have a say in software development you are welcome to
contribute to the code
So only people who write code have a say in the development of
LibreOffice? What about people who do the QA? Or the people providing
support? (I mainly provide support for OOo, mainly for Mac users)
You can take your elitist developer attitude and stuff it.
There is more heat than light now.
I haven't counted, but my clear sense is that considerably more
contributors to this thread have, however reluctantly, come down on the
side of retaining the functionality of writing OOXML. In that sense, a
'decision' is made, even though it's the ESC who ultimately decide.
Nevertheless, as you seem to imply, the OOO/LibO development process has
always been broken.
In an effective development process (eg Firefox), the contents of the
next release, including a positive decision on those bugs to be
resolved, are decided by a steering committee. Work continues until all
of that activity is complete and the release is ready. It is common for
releases to be delayed because things are not ready. With this process,
releases have very few bugs.
In an ineffective development process (eg OOO), the contents of the next
release are set in large part by developers setting release targets for
the bits of work they choose to focus on. If I understand correctly, the
steering committee influences new functionality content, but not
substantially the bug fix content of a release. Thus the content of the
work, particularly bug fixes, is in large measure determined by
developer interest rather than priority or end user wishes. A deadline
for release contents is fixed and anything not ready at this date is put
back to a later release, even P2 bug issues. Very serious issues are
fixed after the chosen date, but nothing else. With this process,
releases inevitably have an increasing number of bugs.
This is a cultural and organisational issue, not a result of an Open
Source project. I hope TDF will recognise this and address it.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy