Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

As many already said, OOXML r/w support is already there,  if you don't like
it, then develop a way to disable it. Someone already developed it, and
that's why it is there already.

Why can anyone think that they can remove any functionality that is already

It is a pain in th a... to do the OOXML r/w support, but someone already did

Why in God's name would is so bad on having it if it's already there?

I believe that any extra functionality that some one develops and actually
works, should be added to OSS, any OSS, and nothing should be banned just
because some religious extremists don't want to have it.

What you are proposing is like banning support for Fat32 or NTFS from
Linux!! Do you understand how crazy that would be????

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.