Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 19:58:41 PM +0100, Italo Vignoli
(italo.vignoli@gmail.com) wrote:

OOXML has been cleared from copyright and patent issues by Microsoft
itself before entering into the standardization process, as this is
a pre-condition of ISO standards. In addition, all Microsoft
document formats and related technologies are now fully documented
(also those totally proprietary). It looks like many people have not
followed the OOXML standardization process.

Italo,

I HAVE tried to follow that process as much as I could through the
years, and my understanding, from the links below and many others, is
that, in practice, even today things aren't really so easy, 100% clear
and risk-free with OOXML. 

http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2010/03/what-should-happen-with-ooxmlo.html
http://techrights.org/2010/01/11/ooxml-depending-on-country/
http://techrights.org/2010/10/03/amicus-briefs-in-i4i-vs-microsoft/
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/02/by-metes-and-bounds.html
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2010/09/recipe-for-open-standards.html

Marco F.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.