On 01/02/2011 11:35 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-02 12:20 PM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
I don't think LO could implement the writing of OOXML in ANY format that
would be compatible to MS. And to try to do so would simply imply that
LO was broken (in MS's words, anyway).
What are you talking about? As has been pointed out numerous times, LibO
*already* *does* write OOXML.
I'm glad you're not the decision maker...
Does it? And to what degree of compatibility? Also, this was code that
was brought in from GO-OO which, as you may be aware, was developed by
Novell UNDER CONTRACT TO MS. No, I'm not hollering FLOSS, here. I'm
trying to get you to understand that there are copyright and patent
issues here that could embroil LO in legal battles that it really
doesn't need.
Craig
Tyche
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format · Charles Marcus
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format · Lee Hyde
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.