On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 12:50 +0000, Ian wrote:
Ok, perhaps a daft suggestion but the principle is that all cell phones
will have a vast amount of RAM and fast CPUs in the next 2 to 3 years. A
gig of RAM is normal now, it would have been unthinkable 10 years ago.
Sure - but our existing performance problems will get no better by
re-writing in Java :-) I think native code is the best approach.
I've seen OO.o running quite nicely on small ARM devices as native
code; that would be my approach to mobile.
So why is there no strategy to get OOo on to these mobile devices? Or
maybe there is ?
Sure - improve performance and memory footprint - that work is
underway, and beef up the ARM port. Beyond that - a new UI shell is
required on top - and we have a mobile phone version.
Ultimately - the techincal strategy is easy; the only problem is people
to actually hack on doing it :-) are you volunteering ? if so, we can
certainly help out with code pointers, review, encouragement, community
All the best :-)
firstname.lastname@example.org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to email@example.com
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Java dependency · RGB ES
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy