On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:08:46 +0100, Christian Lohmaier <email@example.com> wrote:
And I fully agree - just dropping java just for the sake of it is a
very, very bad idea.
Right, but being able to build with --disable-java (which doesn't work
at the moment) should be a worthwhile goal in itself. And if we can
replace a few wizards with C++ equivalents, that wouldn't hurt either...
Maybe we should convert the whole thing to Java :-)
At least then it would run on any platform with a JVM eg cell phone
technology as it moves up into the netbook and laptop spaces.
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
A new approach to assessment for learning
www.theINGOTs.org - 01827 305940
You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy