Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:08:46 +0100, Christian Lohmaier <> wrote:
And I fully agree - just dropping java just for the sake of it is a
very, very bad idea.

Right, but being able to build with --disable-java (which doesn't work
at the moment) should be a worthwhile goal in itself. And if we can
replace a few wizards with C++ equivalents, that wouldn't hurt either...


Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
Posting guidelines:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.