Re: [tdf-discuss] Java dependency

Agree. Java affect key components, not only extensions: base needs
java, and as consequence the bibliographic database too.

2010/11/2 T. J. Brumfield <enderandrew@gmail.com>:
> I'm an user, and not a developer. So perhaps this is a silly question.
>
> > From a user's perspective, it always seemed like the Java portions of OOo
> were shoehorned in. Starting a JVM eats up unneccessary memory and takes
> time. One of the most common complaints of OOo is that it is a bloated app
> that is slow and takes up too many resources.
>
> I assumed that Sun kept the Java portions of OOo in since they liked to push
> Java. In the age of netbooks, tablets and mobile computing, trimming the fat
> becomes more important.
>
> Would it be possible to remove the Java portions of LibreOffice and
> reimplement them without the need to fire up a JVM?
>
> Is there a technical advantage of running the wizards and such in Java that
> I'm not aware of?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- T. J. Brumfield
> "I'm questioning my education
> Rewind and what does it show?
> Could be, the truth it becomes you
> I'm a seed, wondering why it grows"
> -- Pearl Jam, Education
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***