Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

[tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency


On 2010-11-03, Thomas Krumbein <thomas.krumbein@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Am 03.11.2010 09:16, schrieb shundread@gmail.com:
+4 on making Java optional. Personally, I prefer Python for writing
extensions to programs as it usually results in smaller code and less
legal uncertainty. Do we / Can we have the option of making LibO
extensions in Python?

Yes, it is still possible to write Extensions in Python :-)
That is no problem.


Then start porting all the java extensions to python extensions before
talking about removing java dependency. Even if the task half complete,
some features can still be benefit by not loading the JVM.

Maybe create a EasyHack item for porting java extension to python
extension. 

Porting is more like code cleanup except more typing...




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.