On 08/10/10 02:53 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-08 16:47, RGB ES a écrit :
Would this be a security headache?
Could this work for the average user?
Does this not seem a convenience for the end-user community at large?
Others could mirror this repository, but this would be the "upstream
source" for both users/distributions.
Are there other factors I'm missing?
AFAIK, go-oo people maintained a yum repository. So it is possible.
From a marketing point of view, this would be in LibO's interest as
the update to LibO would then be a no brainer even from the user point
of view. Almost a form of "pushing" the LibO updates/upgrades through
without having to go through distro packaging.
In this case, then, it would be a case of having a dedicated
dev-packager for each flavour of packaging system used by the distros.
Marc,
That sums it up rather nicely. ;)
I had not heard of Go-OO ( http://go-oo.org ) before until this
discussion thread.
Visiting their page, it seems like they have the kind of distribution
model that we could leverage.
Scott
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
- Re: LibO Install/Update ( was [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates) (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.