Am 25.01.2011 16:41, schrieb Carlos Carvalho:
Thorsten Guenther (thorsten.guenther@aposso.de) wrote on 25 January 2011 16:20:
>Am 25.01.2011 15:56, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>>
>>> For sites with less capacity, it might be preferred to keep the ISO
>>> images in a separate subtree, easy to exclude.
>> That sounds reasonable and was what I thought about.
>> Having no clue how it works with mirrorbrain in detail, I'll proceed to
>> change that today. :o))
>>
>Hi!
>
>Perhaps rsync-push should be limited to the core parts (eg. the /stable/
>tree) where simultanous release is an issue. So mirror admins can choose
>to rsync-pull the other trees like /old/ and /DVD/.
>Another solution would be to have differend kinds of "subscriptions" for
>rsync-push, but i guess this would be difficult to handle on the TDF side.
What's this rsync-push about? It has nothing to do with mirroring dvd/cd.
I opted to have the mirror contents pushed to my site via rsync, that
makes it an "rsync-push". Question is what contents should be pushed to
mirrors, eg. should the DVD images be pushed. Until now mirror admins
can´t select what ist pushed.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+help@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.