Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1


Thanks Bob. You're right. I wish Larry the best of luck as he seeks a
better solution for his needs.

Happy weekend everyone!


Best,
Joel

On 03/11/2016 05:52 PM, Robert Boehm wrote:
Hi. I just want to say that the whole tone of this conversation was
hostile. I just hope that we can be polite here, even in disagreement.
I am not sure what axes anyone here has to grind, but none of it was
helpful nor useful.

Thanks.

Bob
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 19:22 Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com
<mailto:jmadero.dev@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Good luck moving forward. Hope you find open source software, at
    no cost
    to you, that have developers that will act like your employees and do
    exactly what you want. 13 years in the open source world....I am
    yet to
    see such a project.



    Warmest Regards,
    Joel

    On 03/11/2016 05:17 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
    > In other word you don't give a fuck about Mac users.
    >
    > I am now going to recommend, on all forums and users lists I provide
    > support on, that Mac users not use LibreOffice.
    >
    > Just goes to show what a bunch of a-holes LibreOffice developers
    are.
    >
    > On 2016-03-11, 6:33 PM Joel Madero wrote:
    >> All I said was this isn't the appropriate place to discuss w/e
    opinions
    >> you have. You've gotten a crystal clear answer, your responses
    are "sure
    >> Java has some issues but TDF has a responsibility to offer some
    hacky
    >> solution to work around THEIR bug." We've rejected that
    proposal (which
    >> is pretty obvious why we would) and yet you continue to say the
    same
    >> thing. If there are open bug reports - awesome. There is no
    need for
    >> more (in particular since you're not offering to help implement
    a fix).
    >>
    >> I'll dare to ask....have you bothered Java with perpetual
    emails about
    >> THEIR bug or are you sticking solely to this list?
    >>
    >>
    >> Best,
    >> Joel
    >>
    >> On 03/11/2016 04:29 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
    >>> On 2016-03-11, 5:55 PM Joel Madero wrote:
    >>>> In short....no.
    >>> Gee. Very in-depth answer.
    >>> Or do you, like some others here, not care about Mac users
    perceptions
    >>> of LibreOffice?
    >>>
    >>> Since I am not on the developer list (and it is not available
    through
    >>> Gmane, which is the only way I follow these and other lists) this
    >>> seemed like the most appropriate list.
    >>>
    >> __________
    >>
    >
    >


    --
    To unsubscribe e-mail to:
    discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
    <mailto:discuss%2Bunsubscribe@documentfoundation.org>
    Problems?
    http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
    Posting guidelines + more:
    http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
    List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
    All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
    cannot be deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.