Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [tdf-discuss] Intervention

On 08/11/2014 05:06 AM, Owen Genat wrote:
> jean-christophe manciot wrote
> > 3) It is not always possible for the bug reporters to hand over their
> > original file(s), for many different reasons that are beyond the scope
> > of this thread (confidentiality, legal concerns and so on...).
> I do not consider these reasons beyond the scope of this thread as most
> documents can be effectively redacted using a few simple measures. This is
> actually an important discussion. I understand that sometimes redaction is
> not an option and in these instances other options are required.
>
>
> jmadero wrote
> > It's up to a user to report with clear steps and a simple test document -
> > else it's just a
> > waste of our time.
> Joel, would it be worth having some step-by-step instructions on a wiki page
> somewhere to assist users with the process of redacting their documents?
> Usually a simple search / replace regular expression is enough for most
> documents. A list of some before / after examples may also be helpful. I
> have assisted users with this before on the alternate user forum. It is not
> going to help in every instance, but even if it inproved a small percentage
> it may be worth it.
For some reason I thought Robinson might have already done this. But if 
not - sure, someone can go ahead and add it to "how to report a bug" 
wiki. Wiki is open for everyone to fiddle with and this surely would be 
good advice.

Best,
Joel


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted