On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:04, Simon Phipps <email@example.com> wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote:
For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions
become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not
be able to take it.
Is the provenance that TDF secures at present sufficient for Apache's purposes?
Doubtful. We can't really depend upon third-parties to do provenance
the way that we'd like. The lack of any form of CLA would clearly be
an issue for us.
I'm not sure why people have an aversion to an ICLA.
Probably out of scope here. One of those things that just has to be accepted, like Apache using
Yup. Just noting my wonderment.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy