Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:04, Simon Phipps <> wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote:
For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions
become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not
be able to take it.[1]

Is the provenance that TDF secures at present sufficient for Apache's purposes?

Doubtful. We can't really depend upon third-parties to do provenance
the way that we'd like. The lack of any form of CLA would clearly be
an issue for us.

I'm not sure why people have an aversion to an ICLA.

Probably out of scope here.  One of those things that just has to be accepted, like Apache using 
Svn :-)

Yup. Just noting my wonderment.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.