Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:

Right, Simon. ... but (you saw that coming) would TDF/LO accept
commits into the repository that were only licensed ALv2?

I'm pretty sure they would, yes, since it in no way inhibits outbound licensing under LGPLv3, but 
of course it's for others here to agree :-)

That is great news! Reading over the archives, I was surprised
how some people who wished to contribute to both LOo and OOo
were turned away (with a "we don't want your kind here"),
and so seeing how LOo would now be open to itself accepting
patches and code under AL is a welcome step forward!

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.