On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:16, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:00, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change. That
way people not interested in setting up build servers, etc. can work here
while Apache setup the infrastructure. Given the state of the code dump,
many people will not be able to contribute today, and this lets them.
I think this would be a nice invitation to the Apache community.
What do you think?
As far as I am aware there's no problem with making contributions to LibreOffice using any open
source license that's compatible with both MPL and LGPLv3. Since that includes the Apache
License, I would expect contributions licensed just under that license to be perfectly
acceptable.
Right, Simon. ... but (you saw that coming) would TDF/LO accept
commits into the repository that were only licensed ALv2?
I'm pretty sure they would, yes, since it in no way inhibits outbound licensing under LGPLv3, but
of course it's for others here to agree :-)
Let's also not forget that neither TDF nor the ASF require copyright
assignment. The copyright remains with the contributor. Thus, the
patch can be offered to the TDF under its suggested LGPLv3/MPL
combination, and offered separately to the ASF under an ALv2
license(*).
The question would then appear to be whether Apache would accept contributions under just the
Apache License, without an ICLA (since there are quite a few people here who object to any form of
CLA).
Of course, there is no repository right now (speaking to Keith's
original point), so offering a patch under ALv2 would be easiest since
it could be ported to the ASF by anybody. If TDF doesn't accept it,
then the original author would have to do that porting once the ASF
repository arises.
Presumably anyone can do that porting, not just the original contributor?
S.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing? (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing? · Christoph Jopp
Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing? · Simon Phipps
Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing? · Alexandro Colorado
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.