On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Sorry, but you *based* your conclusion of the inevitability of there being
2 projects on the *ideology* of copyleft vs non-copyleft.
I did that because the diversity of the world of FOSS is a clearly observable fact. You observe a
different world around you? I don't want to argue about it precisely because it's so obvious :-)
It is, agreed. Maybe I am just somewhat of an optimist
that I believe even pure idealogical stakeholders can find
common ground and that nothing is "inevitable".
So back to the constructive point: what are the best, most uniting proposals we can come up with
for ASF and LibreOffice to co-operate?
Agreed again, and glad to see everyone discussing and negotiating
these proposals... and others!
Cheers!
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice (continued)
[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice · Christian Lohmaier
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.