Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:

But just
recall that even the FSF admits that AL2.0 is the best license
where free/open standards are competing with non-free/proprietary

See Bradley Kuhn's rebuttals to Rob Weir[2][3].

"You should only do that when there is a strong reason to justify it."

I see a number of strong reasons, should people decide
to do it.

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.