Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:

The plain fact is that Apache's rules do not allow any section of Apache-maintained code to be 
licensed under copyleft licenses. That means that groups of people who have made the the equally 
valid choice to have their work licensed under LGPL will be unable to collaborate within the 
Apache community. As a consequence, any part of the OOo/LO codebase whose locus of development 
moves to Apache cannot be co-developed by people preferring copyleft licensing.

The folk who choose non-copyleft licensing simply won't be welcome at Apache. While the folk who 
choose only Apache licensing will be welcome at LibreOffice (since their Apache-licensed 
contributions can readily be used in the LibreOffice code), they will probably not be content 
with a work-product that's not Apache licensed.

Given these plain facts, I believe it is inevitable that there will be two projects. As such, I 
think it's important to get started on the "rules of engagement" for productive co-operation 
rather than endlessly arguing about licensing or the "possibility" that every developer with 
existing preferences will spontaneously change them.

Personally, I don't think it's "inevitable" at all, nor do I
think it the place for people to make such statements on behalf
of communities that they have, as far as I know, only limited associations

If we want to turn this discussion into an ideological debate about
copyleft and non-copyleft, then I think it's a mistake. But just
recall that even the FSF admits that AL2.0 is the best license
where free/open standards are competing with non-free/proprietary

(PS: True, people who choose "only" copyleft won't be "welcome" at
the ASF (they would be welcome, really, it's just that the ASF
just does AL2... it's just an environment in which they might
feel as outsiders), but neither would those people who choose
"only" non-copyleft feel welcome at TDF... I think most people
are true pragmatics and choose the best license for the job at

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.