There's an important concept in Michael Meeks' e-mail that mustn't get lost:
On 4 Jun 2011, at 17:03, Michael Meeks wrote:
The problem is, that very much of our work is inter-dependent, and we
want people to be able to work all over the code, cleaning, translating
and fixing it. It would suck giant rocks (through a straw) to say:
"no copy-left lovers need think of working on X Y or Z
big pieces of the code - since we want to license
changes to these on to IBM (via Apache)" :-)
At least - I don't want to just push the division down into the
code-base, excluding people from lots of it (and of course throwing away
our changes to those pieces).
The plain fact is that Apache's rules do not allow any section of Apache-maintained code to be
licensed under copyleft licenses. That means that groups of people who have made the the equally
valid choice to have their work licensed under LGPL will be unable to collaborate within the Apache
community. As a consequence, any part of the OOo/LO codebase whose locus of development moves to
Apache cannot be co-developed by people preferring copyleft licensing.
The folk who choose non-copyleft licensing simply won't be welcome at Apache. While the folk who
choose only Apache licensing will be welcome at LibreOffice (since their Apache-licensed
contributions can readily be used in the LibreOffice code), they will probably not be content with
a work-product that's not Apache licensed.
Given these plain facts, I believe it is inevitable that there will be two projects. As such, I
think it's important to get started on the "rules of engagement" for productive co-operation rather
than endlessly arguing about licensing or the "possibility" that every developer with existing
preferences will spontaneously change them.
S.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
(message not available)
Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice · Gianluca Turconi
[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice · Michael Meeks
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice · Simon Phipps
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.