Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Sorry if you feel that way. I stand by my PoV that what happened
is, in some ways, a victory, even if not the one that TDF ideally
would have wanted. I understand that, and not trying to minimize that
at all.
On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:

> "but a victory is a victory. Enjoy the rare one rather than
> look for next one ;) "
>
> a 'victory' ? going from a copy-left license to source-sinkhole license ?
> are you sure you are posting that on the right ML, or you just enjoy rubbing
> it in ?
> Yeah it is a victory for IBM, no doubt... and a nice departure middle finger
> from Oracle...
> Thanks Apache for lending a helpful hand... they could not have done it
> without you...
> Pardon me if I don't rejoice.
>
> Norbert
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Proposal-to-join-Apache-OpenOffice-tp3022088p3025719.html
> Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -- 
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted