Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
----- Original Message ----
From: Thorsten Behrens <email@example.com>
To: BRM <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wed, May 18, 2011 5:34:38 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?
In some cases, the community decision was aligned with the
members, but they stilled didn't take to the decision through the
community but through what they wanted so it the decision seemed
more forced on the community than decided by the community even in
well, the thing with decision making is that invariably, you'll make
people unhappy - that said, the canonical answer to your problem is,
strive for, and apply for membership. In contrast to the OOo
project, members collectively have a true say here.
- e.g. go back and read the Copyright Assignment discussion.
Um - surely that's a bad example for deciding against the community
- since all of the developer community made it abundantly clear that
they don't like copyright assignment so much? ;)
You missed the point. That was actually an example where they made the right
decision but for the wrong reason. Yes the developers were overwhelmingly for
not having any copyright assignment; however, the 3 people founding TDF at the
time decided long before the community came to that decision not to do it and
didn't really even listen to the community, participate beneficially in the
discussion, etc. So as I said, the decision seemed forced upon the community
rather than decided by the community even though the community did agree on that
On the other hand, there were discussions regarding the GO-OO patches as well as
whether or not to support writing OOXML - topics that were sidelined in favor of
a decision by the same 3 people rather than listening to the community. So
again, decisions that affect the community - some of which have potentially
legal impacts and pitfalls - were decided not by the community but forced by a
While I was originally optimistic that TDF/LO would be better than Sun/Oracle
OOo, as a result I have yet to see that happen.
That's not to say it isn't happening or the community isn't taking over - I'm
just waiting a bit longer to see.
So for now yes, I continue to use OOo. If TDF/LO shows it is truly a community
project and not ruled by a benevolent few that are forcing the hands of the
community, then I will likely switch over and start participating more - until
then I shall continue to watch.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy