RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums - A Different Question

Om the basis of the discussions going on at this list, I do share your
analysis as expressed in:
http://daedaleus.isaachummel.com/2011/05/01/whither-openoffice/

But I wonder/doubt if the view "the LibreOffice community is mired in
excessive open source zeal and geek elitism" also applies to the developers
who do the real work.

Pieter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isaac Hummel [mailto:isaac@daedaleus.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:12 AM
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums - A Different Question
>
> On 05/02/2011 10:49 PM, NoOp wrote:
> > Sorry, but I'd have to disagree...
> > http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
> > The resources are owned and operated by Oracle.
> >
> > Whilst http://user.services.openoffice.org may (currently) 
> tolerate LO 
> > posts, certainly LO/TDF should prefer to not continue to send 
> > users/prospective users to OOo properties for support and answers 
> > regarding LO. Doing so is akin to having OOo send users/prospective 
> > users to the LO users list for support.
> Except that OpenOffice.org has a users mailing list and LO 
> doesn't have a web forum (and won't set one up in the 
> foreseeable future, if the discussions about it on these 
> lists are anything to go by).
>
> --
> Isaac Hummel
> isaac@daedaleus.com
> http://daedaleus.isaachummel.com
>
>
> -- 
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines + more: 
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and 
> cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted