On 17/04/2011 22:33, RGB ES wrote:
Aqualung already listed the content of the get-help page and the lack
of any reference to existing forums and that is my main point too
(don't worry, I'll not talk about socialism nor capitalism... ;) ).
I'll not quote anyone in particular here, so let's see if I can make
the whole idea more clear by itself.
Did you referenced it in the es website?
For whatever reason "normal people" do not use mailing lists nor irc
I've not the money to use a forum, strange isn't it, I may not be
This people who arrives to that get-help page searching for
help with their problems will not find solutions on an easy way. And
people who cannot find a solution on an easy way will not use a
oh, and why didn't they go to the forum, too complicated?
ah, in the country I leave, using a product without pirating it make you
in the safe way of expressing yourself, just a point of view however.
And by the way, even in France, where the liberty of expression is
respected (in some way) free software in ministry is also a political
choice, so sorry if I don't caution your reasoning, it's a bit leak for
me for justifying a dedicated forum, in fact, I don't see where you're
Is everything about trust: people will trust a product not because
they can use it for free (people usually do not consider idealogical
issues like file formats nor open code when choosing their solutions),
usually they only look if that software can solve their *immediate*
problem on an easy way. And that of course include how they get help
when they have a problem.
If on that get-help page you say "even if there is no warranty you'll
get an answer there, we trust the people who maintain that board so
use it with confidence and good luck" you will help a lot more people.
Ha, with confidence and good luck?
the clear position is as usual and what Christian answered you, why do
you want to divide resources where they have proven to be effective? you
are missing collaboration? so work to be collaborative with the forum,
don't reproach the entire project of something you didn't achieve.
That, together with dialogue, is a possible "official collaboration".
Communication with people is the main issue here. Maybe my first
message had a very low level of patience, my fault, sorry. But that
was because I consider that having a clear position on this topic is
of a great importance.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again · RGB ES
[tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again · Michelle Konzack
Re: [tdf-discuss] Forums... again · Daniel Gonzalez
- [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy