Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

I think it's inevitable that more and more differences of opinion will
arise, so I also believe LO should start their own independent path.

Just my 2c, ;-)

Jaime

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:51, Phil Hibbs <snarks@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kohei:
> > That's the wrong assumption I was trying to point out.  It's not always
> > applied as-is, and in fact it's rare that patches be accepted as is.
> > Even we don't do that too often.
>
> Nonetheless, saying "it's better for us if you don't submit your
> patches to OOo" is kind of like saying "Lets hope OOo don't spot this
> bug/issue". It's ethically dubious. If this is the official approach,
> then why not just make a clean break with OOo and not even try to
> merge in any future OOo code changes with the LO code?
>
> Phil Hibbs.
> --
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***