Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

IMO, to put the write part on an external extension is a good idea.
There are other extensions for import export (like
OpenOffice.org2GoogleDocs that gives export capabilities to
GoogleDocs, Zoho and WebDAV)
I still think that there are too many thing on "save as" dialogue that
should go on "export" instead, but moving at least this conflictive
ooxml part to an extension could bring some peace

2011/1/2 James Wilde <>:
Is anyone else getting the impression that this thread is polarising into US v rest of world?

We've seen several people say that they have to accept what their customers provide and can't go 
back to the customer and say "can you provide this in another format?".  To me that's an attitude 
which I, rightly or wrongly, associate with the US.  In Europe we just fire away an email and get 
the file back again in another format.

And the other side of the coin, as others have said, outside the US more and more governments and 
non-US corporations are going over to FLOSS, whereas in the US, Microsoft is dominant.

If this is the case, we're never going to reach concensus on this topic.  Personally I've already 
signed up on Larry's side.  How about this for a compromise:

LibO comes with support to read docx (which it converts to ODT), but not to write it.  When 
someone tries to write it, a notice comes up saying in effect that docx is a broken format which 
even MS doesn't think much of, and that LibO, in the interests of free standards does not support 
it in vanilla mode.  However, click on this button and we'll save in doc format. One might even 
provide two buttons (plus Cancel), Save as doc and Save as odt.

But for the Americans and others who might want it, a downloadable module is provided which will 
write to docx format.  Then we turn the matter over to the educators, communicators and marketers 
to educate, communicate with and market to the North American continent.  Then those who want it 
can get docx compatibility, but they have to make an active choice and they're told it's risky 
and why.

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.