Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] accessibility mailing list


Hi,

At 18:13 29/11/2010, jonathon wrote:
On 11/29/2010 02:14 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
(...)
>It's only solution is to get Your tools and Your communication partners help You achieving that task.

LibO intrinsically fails Section 508 criteria.  Given how low that bar
is, I suspect that any country whose a11y legislation has any merit,
should automatically disqualify LibO from consideration.

The USA are ahead of most other countries (including much of Europe) with regard to accessibility legislation. (The EU wants to create a standard for accesibility requirements for ICT in public procurement, but I don't expect a final standard before 2012.)


> This can be shurely be demanded by someone willing tho help development.
> Someone looking for advice is a completely different story and should be handled as such.

When it comes to a11y, the first step is to learn if the program works
with the software that sort of succeeds in providing the data they need,
so that the program can almost be used.

Just to make sure that we are all on the same page: people with disabilities do not always use assistive technology. Sometimes it is just a matter of setting high contrast and bigger font size in the OS, which any app should than inherit. For others, keyboard access is essential.

There are some resources where developers can find out about how people with disabilities use ICT or the Web, e.g.: * Personas based on research on people with disabilities, e.g. those by the AEGIS project <http://www.aegis-project.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=63&Itemid=53> (Creative Commons!); * videos of how people with disabilities use ICT: <http://www.uiaccess.com/accessucd/resources_videos.html>; * the W3C's "How People with Disabilities Use the Web": <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web.php>.

In addition: older people can also benefit from accessibility features software, but they don't want to be considered as "people with disabilities"? (Decreased vision? "That's just part of getting old, dear.")

Best regards,

Christophe


--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
---
"Better products and services through end-user empowerment" www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu
---
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.