Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 11/29/2010 02:14 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:

does this mean they need support for reason of lacking accessibility efficience

More likely that they need the code to be rewritten so that they can use
it. In the meantime, they learn workaroudns that fail, but don't look
like they fail.

It's only solution is to get Your tools and Your communication partners help You achieving that 

LibO intrinsically fails Section 508 criteria.  Given how low that bar
is, I suspect that any country whose a11y legislation has any merit,
should automatically disqualify LibO from consideration.

This can be shurely be demanded by someone willing tho help development.
Someone looking for advice is a completely different story and should be handled as such.

When it comes to a11y, the first step is to learn if the program works
with the software that sort of succeeds in providing the data they need,
so that the program can almost be used.

No human will see non-list, non-bulk, non-junk email sent to this address.
It all gets forwarded to /dev/null

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.