Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibO document format: strict ODF or extended ODF?


Il 01/11/2010 23.51, Thorsten Behrens ha scritto:
b) OASIS, for very good practical reasons, only wants to standardize
    what has been successfully implemented (by at least three
    independent products, even) - so out of necessity, you'll need
    implementations of not-yet-standardized features, to actually
    make those standardizable via OASIS.

So I guess moving on&  extending ODF is a feature, not a bug - of
course, for those who need it, you want a "strict mode" (which we
have).

Uhm...

Extending ODF *in agreement with* at least two other vendors is a feature, because you're reasonably sure that feature will be implemented in ODF specification.

Simply extending ODF (with good features, of course) on a vendor basis is just fragmentation, IMO.

Regards,
--
Gianluca Turconi

--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.