On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:34:11 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
The more interesting thing to me is - why would you want to remove the
PDF Import ? or the Presenter Console ?
Because I don't like that additional complexity in the UI? (Just an
example) There are valid reasons why I would want to remove
extensions. Not being able to disable 'shared' extensions is just some
missing functionality that should be implemented.
But not by calling developers something close to dimwits. An enhancement
issue should be filed, and developer support gathered to implement that
right. The linked OOo wiki page shows that even OOo considers the
current system of 2-layered extensions (shared and per-user) suboptimal,
so there we have an opportunity to get it right, IMHO. But that really
belongs on the developer list :).
Sebastian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Non-removable extensions (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Non-removable extensions · Luis E Vásquez r
Re: [tdf-discuss] Non-removable extensions · Sebastian Spaeth
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.