Il 02/11/2010 13.32, Thorsten Behrens ha scritto:
[...]
Simply extending ODF (with good features, of course) on a vendor
basis is just fragmentation, IMO.
A healthy dose of vendor-specific extensions is one of the hallmarks
of a working ecosystem, if you ask me - at least if you want for ODF
to be the default document format. ;)
Uhm... again ;-)
Technically speaking, it may be true, because users always ask for new
features, but when we're talking about open formats and document
exchange, it's quite different.
If I have 20.000 documents that use a feature implemented in LibO only
and I have to exchange/migrate such documents or I implement that
feature in other applications by spending good money or I'm "locked in"
(pay attention, I've used quotes here).
Just my 2c, of course.
Regards,
Gianluca
--
Gianluca Turconi
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.