Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi all,

BRM wrote (29-10-10 00:41)

From: Thorsten Behrens<thb@documentfoundation.org>

BRM wrote:
The Linux Kernel guys don't require it; KDE E.v. does. Both  methods have
their pros and cons.

Hi, just a very small  correction here - KDE e.V. does not require
it, it is optional to sign their  FLA (a trait shared among other
FLOSS projects, e.g. the Python Foundation  acts similarly).

Thank you for the correction. I thought they did from what I had read a while
back.
Yet another method to accomplish the same goal.

What would be the use of people giving the option to share a CA or not. Just the fact that, in case for e.g. a licence update, you only have to contact x% of the contributors?


Regards,
Cor

--
 - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -


--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.