Re: [tdf-discuss] Better defaults

Le 2010-10-27 17:30, AG a écrit :

> Well, that's why it is all open and above board, the code is open, the
> fields are explicitly defined, clear data specifications, and the system
> mails out to LibO (cc the user) the reports. It isn't data mining: it is
> voluntary, the default option is no, it can be stopped at any time, it
> is participatory to the levels of detail the user is okay with, it
> invites open transparent scrutiny, and posts the user a copy of the
> report being sent.
>
> Moreover, it wouldn't affect the installation of LibO - it is a
> voluntary participation in research and users can opt in if they want,
> and if not, then fine.

This sounds reasonable to me. I would prefer it if it were just a one 
time only thing. I don' think that there would be a need for a 
continuous feed of information from the users. I imagine the marketing 
team would have to take a hard look at this. I'll leave a copy of this 
on the marketing mailist.

> I'm not defending the idea, nor am I saying that this is what
> "popularity contest" does. I was asking after how feasible a basic
> approach like that would be for LibO community's purposes.

Hi AG, thanks for the info. Don't worry, I always consider these threads 
as discussions and I hope I didn't sound like I  was criticizing you and 
I apologize if it sounded this way.

> > Is there anything like that on the debian project?
> >
> > Marc
> Here's the scoop on the popularity contest itself, launched early 2004:
>
> "The Debian popularity-contest is a concept created by Avery Pennarun a
> few years ago. It set up a program on the hosts installing the
> popularity-contest package, to email the list of packages installed
> and in use to a central collection point. It also collect the host
> architecture and we plan to collect kernel version and modules used as
> well. The summaries are presented on <URL:http://popcon.debian.org/>
> and used to sort the packages on the Debian CDs.
>
> The information can be used in other areas as well. It can detect
> which packages in the debian archive which aren't installed on any
> hosts. Such packages should probably be checked out and possibly be
> removed from the archive. It has already been used to check which
> non-free packages are actually in use, while discussing the future for
> non-free."
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/75753/
>
> AG
Thanks. Always nice to know how some other distros are getting their 
information.

Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***