On 2010-10-17 10:48 PM, Ramon Sole wrote:
Both communities will be able to collaborate in tons of things, but the
project leaders can't share responsabilities in both projects. If so,
why to have two Communities?
I don't think this this is correct in the case of OOo - while it is of
course fine for LibO to continue syncing code changes from OOo, since
Oracle is continuing Sun's requirement of copyright assignment etc, it
will be impossible for any LibO code to make it back-stream into the OOo
code base.
Or am I wrong?
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [tdf-discuss] Basic question about Oracle asking OOo community members to leave · Graham Lauder
Re: [tdf-discuss] Basic question about Oracle asking OOo community members to leave · Charles Marcus
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.