On 2010-10-06 7:54 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
If there were a common method to do incremental updates (linux) to
avoid too much work from the devs, this would be great. Judging by
the discussions, it looks like it could be a challenge though.
I disagree... the way I see it working is:
1. The devs provide one standard 'diff' file for any/all platforms to
use - it would be up to the individual packagers to take that diff and
apply it according to the standards imposed by their package management
system.
2. The current 'internal' 'updater' (which is more like a notifier and
download manager now) could become a Windows-only true 'Updater' that
applies the diff in the 'Windows way' (just please don't make a system
reboot a requirement)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates · Erich Christian
Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Updates · Jean Hollis Weber
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.