Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?


Hi,

Am 01.10.2010 20:31, schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
""Oracle is investing substantial resources in OpenOffice.org.  With more
than one hundred million users, we believe OpenOffice.org is the most
advanced, most feature rich open source implementation and will strongly
encourage the Open Office community to continue to contribute through
www.openoffice.org.  However, the beauty of open source is that it can
be forked by anyone who chooses, as was done today.  Our sincerest goal
for Open Office is that it become more widely used so if this new
foundation will help advance Open Office and the Open Document Format we
wish them the best.""

In my opinion it means (at this very moment) that there will be
OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice as well.

Not necessarily:
They state:
"Oracle is investing substantials resources in OpenOffice.org"
I don't know if they mean the product (developers) or the community
(infrastructure) in this point, but both is true and has ever been
appreciated by the volunteer part of our community.
But further down the line they talk about "Open Office" instead of
"OpenOffice.org".
If they did this on purpose (and I have to assume, that the "official
statement" doesn't include such mistakes), so it has to be interpreted
as referring to "Oracle Open Office" instead of "OpenOffice.org".
So what is the "Open Office Community"?
Reading the statement again, this might mean that the "OpenOffice.org
Community" should "... encourage the Open Office Community (sic!) to
continue to contribute through www.openoffice.org."


Bernhard thanks a lot for pointing this out!
(me too tried to drive attention on that on the german list)


I always worked on improving and furthering OpenOffice.org - not for a
company's but for our community's sake.
I am not part of the "Open Office Community", but of the "OpenOffice.org
Community".
Even if I still hope for the trademark to be given back to us, this
message is at least a sign in a dedicated direction. :-(


well said...  ;-)


I don't think it is a problem, why not, if Oracle wants keep OO.o both
could developed. We will see if there is real contribution or not.

They will develop Oracle Open Office - about OpenOffice.org's future
there is nothing written in this statement.

guess why


And anyway the OOo name and rights owned by Oracle so we could do
nothing.

We will not wait very long - too much to do and to decide.

Thanks again, "waiting for Godot"  ;-)

cheers
Erich
-- 
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.