Sophie wrote (01-10-10 23:11)
Charles Marcus wrote:
One thing I would like to see the Document Foundation undertake is to
(or at least try to) organize the other major efforts, like Go-oo,
OxygenOffice and NeoOffice - and maybe now even IBM/Lotus Symphony - to
eliminate duplication of effort and coordinate patch acceptance, etc.
This is I think what we would like to offer, may be not only one brand
but a home for each flavour. This is why we moved to no CA/JCA/SCA and
stayed with the LGPLv3.
Well said Sophie. It is one of the main goals of the foundation: a place
where the mutual interest of all people and companies around
OpenOffice.org can really come to a impressive multiplier effect.
That is what open source is about (too) and that we like to see happen
more and more.
>> free OpenOffice.org : LibreOffice <<
- giving openoffice.org its foundation? The Document Foundation -
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to email@example.com
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ? · Terry Warby
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy