Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index 


Fabian Rodriguez wrote


You're mixing up two things here. A dev can adopt a feature (or even
implement a feature he wants) directly, but it rests on the community to
accept it, not the other way around.

Normally a feature would go through such due process, in some cases it
may be rejected even if several devs line up to implement it.



I think you are confusing "community-driven" with democratic as I did.
Get yourself a large cup of tea and read this topic
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Floppy-icon-and-meritocracy-tp3725399p3725399.html

Regards,
Pedro

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Best-way-to-suggest-new-features-tp3784811p3794511.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.