Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

Hi,

Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-15 23:56:
> As well the proposal of Charles (Tanstaafl) of having a choice
> while subscribing is worth considering. Maybe there is a possibility to
> have a further subscribing mode with mlmmj. If possible, this might be
> not ideal, but should be no problem for a dev mind. But this is nothing
> to be in effect within days.

indeed. I don't know if this approach makes sense - it causes more 
system load (because mails have to be processed twice), and needs 
development time.

> The good news: Since the beginning there is a volunteer from the admin
> team, happy to solve the issue. Not withdrawing his offer (well,
> thinking several times about it).
>
> - it's me! :o)) I'm in favor of switching off reply-to mangling, but
> without hurting valueable contributors, we urgently need.
>
> As I'm tired now, I'll stress that more in a (near ;o))) future mail and
> as well the following questions.

Well, since it's Christmas soon anyways, and I am busy with "real life" 
things ;), I will keep my hands off this topic anyways for the moment. I 
still think we should do something soon, as the developers have been 
asking for a change for months, two of them we discussed - but I myself 
won't have time before next year, so let's leave it at that for now...

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted