Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling

Hi,

Tanstaafl wrote on 2011-12-15 13:06:

> So, my proposal is to DEFER this decision until after mailman3 is
> released, migrate the lists to mailman3, then simply document how
> individual list subscribers can choose their poison.
>
> I'd also suggest that the DEFAULT be to enable reply-to mangling, and
> explain to the user how they can change this in the welcom emessage that
> is sent.

you and Uwe have good points here. The rationale behind me pushing for 
an evaluation now is that the clear feedback was

1. we want the developers to be more involved on the non-developers lists

2. the developers strongly prefer a to have no reply-to mangling

So, in terms of inclusion, I wanted to do that change right now, but, 
well, if there's not even support for a "let's try it", I don't know 
what to do...

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted