Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling
Hi NoOp, *,
Am 30.11.2011 04:50 schrieb NoOp:
On 11/28/2011 08:23 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
* make it easy for new and peripherally involved users to get
replies to their casual E-mails without doing a long list of
Where by a long list of operations, I mean, that in order to get a
reply to your mail/question, first you need to:
[.. trimmed the referenced paragraph ..]
You've obviously never spent time on the OOo user & discuss lists...
[.. bad experience with above use case ..]
I subscribe to over 80 lists (via gmane.org)
Using a nntp-client You are not affected by the change..
and respond regularly to 10-15 daily. Were I required to adjust my
standard 'Reply' to specifically reply to the list rather than the
individual poster I'd have to make major modifications to my client
Would You consider to do that change if You knew making life easier for
*many* community co-members by doing so?
Anyways - You don't have to ;o))
I view and respond to a list, not to individual posters.
There are so many pro and cons regarding that, how about having it most
easy *for both sides* to follow their believing?
Further, the changes that you are requesting (if I understand them
You probably don't.. The change in question only concerns reverting
the setting of the "reply-to: $list" header added by the mailinglist
software to each message sent.
would mean that I'd then have an additional, direct email in
my inbox from each list poster when I've specifically chosen to view &
respond via an nntp source (gmane.org) rather than list email.
No. This can happen if accidently a poster uses "reply to all" instead
of "reply-to-list", without trimming the posters address.
Your request now places the burden on each list user to make changes
in order to avoid responding to the list poster and instead reply to
the list in general.
No. Only those using "reply" instead of "reply-to-list" have to change
their habits (which admittedly might cause some annoyance during the
[.. general mailinglist access proposal ..]
If you wish to reply to each poster individually, then perhaps you can
modify Evolution 3.0.2 to conform to Reply and 'Reply All' to suit your
Thats the reason the change will be done: Make Your mail software work
how it's intended to work, regardless which one.
- Admin team -
The Document Foundation
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [tdf-discuss] overall communication guidelines and reply-to mangling (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy