On 07/28/2011 04:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
All that I see & know for sure is that it took 5 years and the code
still is not in the repo.
IBM claims that since it was in an OOo 1.1.x branch, it was in the repo,
and that it is Sun's fault that it wasn't incorporated into OOo 2.x, or
A claim that ignores that it was placed in the branch substantially
after development of the main trunk the branch was part of, had ceased
Rather than suggesting Symphony, suggest switching to linux instead.
Trying to switch a blind user to Linux is an exercise in futility.
None of the screen readers for Linux are even close to being "drop in"
replacements for JAWS.
Retraining a blind person to use Linux isn't a matter of spending two or
three days in training. Instead, you are looking at 60 - 90 days of
training, of which a good third of which will be sitting at the desk of
the blind user, helping them overcome the design flaws of the software
that they are attempting to use.
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.
If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy