On 25 April 2011 10:40, drew <drew@baseanswers.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 11:17 +0200, CaStarCo wrote:
2011/4/25 Italo Vignoli <italo.vignoli@gmail.com>
On 04/25/2011 08:59 AM, todd rme wrote:
Sounds like latex
Apart from discussions on the characteristics of the file format,
ebooks
are definitely outside the scope of The Document Foundation. There are
already several organizations working around ebooks, and taking care of
the
related problems.
<snip>
Wich organizations? I think that if we have to trust that these
organizations will innovate we are going to wait a very long time. I know
that I am not a guru and not and expert, but I think that this work is
not
impossible.. then, why the actual ebooks are that set of static crap? why
it's so difficult to make technic books for ebook readers? the usage of
semantic data is restricted in a very poor set of cases... and the
"standard" format EPUB is very Spartan.
<snip>
I was writting to the OpenDocument Foundation
Close - but not quite - this is a list for The Document Foundation.
The OpenDocument standard is overseen by a different organization, OASIS
- http://www.oasis-open.org/
because i thought it was a
little more than LibreOffice... It's only LibreOffice?
I hope that it will be eventually.
Thanks
Drew Jensen
I think this is a very interesting issue. We are moving from the dominant
technologies that were designed to put information on paper to the dominant
need of presenting information on screens. With the revolution in digital
readers this is only going to increase and then what relevance has document
formats that are primarily designed to target hard copy output? If odf does
not adapt it will become obsolete.
I am constantly irritated by having to download pdfs, .docs and so on when
all I want to do is view the information without cluttering up my download
area with hundreds of files that only ever get glanced at. In most of these
cases simply putting the info in a web page would do and if it really needs
printing, print that page or create a pdf from it. Even if we are not there
yet, most information in the future will never get printed to hard copy and
that is going to be more the case as time goes on. LO and odf have to be
adapt.
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
The Schools ITQ
www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format (continued)
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format · Christophe Strobbe
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format · Christophe Strobbe
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format · Italo Vignoli
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format · CaStarCo
Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format · CaStarCo
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.