Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 11:17 +0200, CaStarCo wrote:
> 2011/4/25 Italo Vignoli <italo.vignoli@gmail.com>
>
> > On 04/25/2011 08:59 AM, todd rme wrote:
> >
> >  Sounds like latex
> > >
> >
> > Apart from discussions on the characteristics of the file format, ebooks
> > are definitely outside the scope of The Document Foundation. There are
> > already several organizations working around ebooks, and taking care of the
> > related problems.

<snip>

> Wich organizations? I think that if we have to trust that these
> organizations will innovate we are going to wait a very long time. I know
> that I am not a guru and not and expert, but I think that this work is not
> impossible.. then, why the actual ebooks are that set of static crap? why
> it's so difficult to make technic books for ebook readers? the usage of
> semantic data is restricted in a very poor set of cases... and the
> "standard" format EPUB is very Spartan.

<snip>

> I was writting to the OpenDocument Foundation

Close - but not quite - this is a list for The Document Foundation.

The OpenDocument standard is overseen by a different organization, OASIS
- http://www.oasis-open.org/

>  because i thought it was a
> little more than LibreOffice... It's only LibreOffice?

I hope that it will be eventually.

Thanks

Drew Jensen


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted