Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I believe there are some specific legal issues that are related to FOSS
licences, but we do need to investigate some more (help is welcome). 


Le Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:41:52 +0100,
Jonathan Aquilina <> a écrit :

Would we do something with LO, or would there be GPL licensing issues?

On 01/07/2011 10:04 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote:
Am 07.01.11 04:57, schrieb todd rme:

- It is not packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging
technologies included in Xcode – No third party installers are
allowed (I thought this was a major goal of LibO)
It /is/ "packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging
technologies" as far as the Mac Version of OOo is concerned - it's
a *.dmg file containing an *.app folder, which his a common way of
installing programs on a Mac.

NeoOffice is listed since years in the download area of so
this can not be that problematic.

Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.