Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

Hello Johannes

2011/1/3 Johannes A. Bodwing <jobod@arcor.de>

> Hi,
>
> > ...
> >
> >
> > But ultimately someone or some group has to make the final decision
> > about what is and is not going to be included.  In the case of TDF, it
> > is the ESC.  The people in that group have the authority to make a
> > final decision.
> ...
> OK for that. Where can I find the criteria for this decisions?
> What I mean:
> The german website says: TDF is founded to get a greater indipendence from
> commercial influence.
> The TDF-site adds on: ... and will deliver the best software for users ...
> But how will anyone find out what the best software is? Is it from the
> number of downloads? Is it a very good review from IT-experts?
> What's the background (for ESC) to decide what leads to the best software
> for users?
> If one says: It's the experience of ESC - OK, what experience does that
> mean? I don't know it.
> Don't get me wrong but I feel like in front of a black box.
> Or is it just a lack of communication?



I would just that we're barely 3 months old :-) so not everything's ready.
Please have a look there, it might answer some of your questions:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws

As for the general tone of this mailing list and this discussion, you (not
you Johannes, in particular) will read in the same documents that offensive
and improper behavior can lead to exclusion.

Thanks,

Charles-H. Schulz

> Greetings,
> Johannes
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
> Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***