Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
besides email people want a calendar as well as a to do list as well functionality wise, which Thunderbird seems to lack.

On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying?  You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO.  You just have to allow Thunderbird to
connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they
want all the other bells and whistles.  Therefore, no increase in size
due to bundling but the advantage that those that WANT the extras can
have them without difficulty
I agree, an integration add-on for Thunderbird (and any other e-mail
clients or contact managers with an add-on architecture) would be a far
better use of resources. Simply making contacts available to LibreOffice
would do wonders for mail-merge luck functionality (for the life of me I
can't think of any other functionalities one would require of an outlook
clone).
On a related subject, I am using an older version of Tbird because I hate the new versions. each time they have "improved" it lately they have actually made it worse as far as basic usability. The problem I have with the newer versions is that they make it far to difficult to enlarge the text for readability. WHY can't developers put more of a priority on really basic things like that?
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.